Design Criteria
part of the DesignOfPilot pages
These we decide together, below are just some suggestions, It might be just a question of making explicit what we normally consider part of any good permaculture design
Comply with all Ethics, Directives and Principles
of course
and to create a system that self-organises
A Mini-Max way of achieving the Objectives
Lots of Fertile Connections, Elegant Solutions
Creating fertile human eco-systems
A design that builds up over current infra-structures
Including mental infrastructures, like vocabulary, eg.
We already have many "Institutes" of PC .. this is to connect them up (+ the non-Instutes that really are..)
the Diploma Network is a great design, but lacks this infrastructure to connect it up and share the work
Don't re-hash what is already there! Eg. forums, email groups, project sites...
A self-regulating and self-resourcing system
It has to be really sustainable, short and long-term
Solutions that take small and local resources to implement & maintain
Fully Inclusive but also Exclusive enough
Include all permaculture designers that want to share their work
Exclude academics, charlatans, those who talk and don´t do
KISS rule! (Keep It Simple Stupid)
Don´t try to make some 'fulfill all needs and wants' mega-platform: just simplest possible way to fulfill the Objectives
Make connections, don´t reproduce other's work
back to the DesignOfPilot pages
.
.
.
.
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.